基于观测系统退化的气云区地震资料采集参数分析与建议

doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2024.01.008

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (9914 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Shallow gas clouds are widely developed in Bohai Bay. The seismic profiles of areas affected by gas cloud are mostly shown as fuzzy zones， so it is difficult to describe the characteristics of the structure and reservoir accurately. However， there is less academic research on the seismic acquisition of gas cloud area. Therefore， based on the three sets of seismic data with big differences in key acquisition parameters successively acquired in X oilfield of Bohai Bay， this paper performed degradation treatment on the actual geometry and studied the influence of a single acquisition parameter on the seismic imaging of gas cloud area， including acquisition direction， bin size， and fold， on the premise that other acquisition parameters are consistent. Finally， the paper obtained three conclusions that could guide seismic acquisition designs of offshore gas cloud areas. ① The imaging of banded gas clouds is greatly affected by acquisition direction， and the imaging quality inside gas cloud is relatively better when the acquisition is performed along the short axis of gas clouds. The plane influence range of gas cloud is relatively smaller when the acquisition is performed along the long axis of gas cloud. It is suggested that the shape of gas clouds should be fully considered in seismic acquisition. In addition， bidirectional acquisition and fusion processing should be used to improve the imaging of gas cloud areas for banded gas clouds with obvious directional characteristics. ② The differences in imaging quality of gas cloud areas and plane influence range of gas cloud under different bin sizes are small， and the reduction of bin size contributes little to the imaging of gas cloud areas.It is suggested that conventional bin size should be adopted in seismic acquisition of gas cloud areas， instead of emphasizing small bin size. ③ After reaching a certain number of folds， the increase of fold contributes little to the imaging of area not affected by gas cloud， while it is still significant to the imaging of gas cloud areas. It is suggested to increase the effective fold in seismic acquisition of gas cloud area.

Key words： gas cloud area geometry degradation acquisition direction bin size fold

Received: 02 December 2022

PACS:

P631

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DING Hongbo
	XU Dekui
	DUAN Xinyi
	MA Zhen

Cite this article:

DING Hongbo,XU Dekui,DUAN Xinyi等. Analysis and suggestion of seismic data acquisition parameters in gas cloud area based on geometry degradation[J]. OGP, 2024, 59(1): 51-60.

URL:

http://www.ogp-cn.com/EN/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2024.01.008 OR http://www.ogp-cn.com/EN/Y2024/V59/I1/51

[1]	明君, 邹振, 夏同星, 等. 大规模气云区成因分析——以渤海湾A油田为例[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2019, 54(2): 312-319.MING Jun, ZOU Zhen, XIA Tongxing, et al. Origin analysis of the large-scale shallow gas-obscured zone: an example of the Oilfield A, Bohai Bay[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54(2): 312-319.
[2]	李彦鹏, 孙鹏远, 魏庚雨, 等. 利用陆上三分量数据改善气云区构造成像[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2009, 44(4): 417-424.LI Yanpeng, SUN Pengyuan, WEI Gengyu, et al. Using 3-C land seismic data to improve structural imaging in gas chimney area[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, 44(4): 417-424.
[3]	张四海, 李向阳, 李岩, 等. 基于二极化校正的陆上气云区的转换波成像[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2013, 48(2): 200-205.ZHANG Sihai, LI Xiangyang, LI Yan, et al. Converted-wave imaging based on the diodic moveout in a land gas-cloud area[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 48(2): 200-205.
[4]	刘振武, 撒利明, 张明, 等. 多波地震技术在中国部分气田的应用和进展[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(6): 668-672.LIU Zhenwu, SA Liming, ZHANG Ming, et al. Progress of application of multi-wave seismic technology in part of gas-fields of China[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2008, 43(6): 668-672.
[5]	张志军, 周东红. 数据驱动的 “气云” 区振幅补偿方法[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2016, 51(3): 474-479, 505.ZHANG Zhijun, ZHOU Donghong. Amplitude compensation in gas cloud area based on a data-driven algorithm[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 51(3): 474-479, 505.
[6]	夏同星, 刘垒, 明君, 等. 渤海湾X油田气云区地震资料关键处理技术研究[J].石油物探, 2018, 57(2): 283-291.XIA Tongxing, LIU Lei, MING Jun, et al. Key processing technologies of seismic data for a gas cloud area in the X oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(2): 283-291.
[7]	周东红, 夏同星, 曹盛, 等. 气云区地震成像关键处理技术——以渤海湾某油田为例[J].地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(6): 2613-2618.ZHOU Donghong, XIA Tongxing, CAO Sheng, et al. Key imaging technologies of gas cloud area: a case study in Bohai Bay[J].Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(6): 2613-2618.
[8]	张志军, 肖广锐, 徐德奎. 基于广义S变换的气云区地震振幅补偿方法[J].中国海上油气, 2019, 31(2): 62-68.ZHANG Zhijun, XIAO Guangrui, XU Dekui. Seismic amplitude compensation method of gas cloud area based on generalized S-transform[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(2): 62-68.
[9]	薛志刚, 轩义华, 刘铮, 等. 气云区全波形反演约束Q场建模技术[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 613-623.XUE Zhigang, XUAN Yihua, LIU Zheng, et al. FWI guided Q modeling technology in gas clouds area[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 613-623.
[10]	徐德奎, 张志军, 夏同星, 等. 海上大型气云发育区地震数据采集参数论证分析[J].石油物探, 2020, 59(2): 186-197.XU Dekui, ZHANG Zhijun, XIA Tongxing, et al. Demonstration analysis of seismic acquisition in a large-scale gas cloud area in the sea[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(2): 186-197.
[11]	尹成, 吕公河, 田继东, 等. 基于地球物理目标参数的三维观测系统优化设计[J].石油物探, 2006, 45(1): 74-78.YIN Cheng, LYU Gonghe, TIAN Jidong, et al. The optimization of 3-D observation system based on geophysical objective parameters[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2006, 45(1): 74-78.
[12]	WLOSZCZOWSKI D, GOU Y, FARAJ A, et al. 3D acquisition parameters: a cost-saving study[C].SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1998, 17: 70-73.
[13]	张伟, 尹成, 田继东, 等. 三维观测系统参数的退化性处理试验[J].石油物探, 2007, 46(1): 69-73.ZHANG Wei, YIN Cheng, TIAN Jidong, et al. Degradation processing experiment based on 3-D geometry parameters[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2007, 46(1): 69-73.
[14]	屠世杰. 高精度三维地震勘探中的炮密度、道密度选择——YA高精度三维勘探实例[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(6): 926-936.TU Shijie. Selection of shot density and trace density in high precision 3D seismic exploration-a high precision 3D exploration case in YA area[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(6): 926-936.
[15]	徐辉, 韩文功, 单联瑜, 等. 基于实际地震资料的覆盖次数和信噪比关系分析[J].石油物探, 2011, 50(2): 181-186, 205.XU Hui, HAN Wengong, SHAN Lianyu, et al. Analysis of the relationship between fold and SNR based on actual seismic data[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2011, 50(2): 181-186, 205.
[16]	徐颖. 塔河油田高精度三维地震采集参数优化研究[J].石油物探, 2014, 53(1): 68-76.XU Ying. Optimization on the high-precision 3D seismic acquisition parameters in Tahe Oilfield[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2014, 53(1): 68-76.
[17]	张军华, 李军, 吴成, 等. 溶洞型储层地震采集参数与成像关系研究[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(4): 573-579.ZHANG Junhua, LI Jun, WU Cheng, et al. The relationship between seismic acquisition parameters and data imaging in areas with cavern reservoirs[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(4): 573-579.
[18]	邸志欣, 张丽娜, 邓光校. 塔河油田高精度勘探地震采集技术分析与实践[J].石油物探, 2016, 55(4): 493-505.DI Zhixin, ZHANG Lina, DENG Guangxiao. Analysis and application on high-precision seismic acquisition technology in Tahe Oilfield[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2016, 55(4): 493-505.
[19]	崔庆辉, 尚新民, 滕厚华, 等. 高密度三维地震观测系统设计技术与应用[J].石油物探, 2020, 59(1): 12-22, 59.CUI Qinghui, SHANG Xinmin, TENG Houhua, et al. Design of a high-density three-dimensional seismic geometry and its application[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(1): 12-22, 59.
[20]	陈习峰, 庞全康, 薛永安, 等. 高邮凹陷中深层火成岩发育区宽方位采集与成像[J].石油物探, 2021, 60(增刊1): 70-76.CHEN Xifeng, PANG Quankang, XUE Yongan, et al. Wide-azimuth acquisition and imaging of for the middle and deep strata of igneous rock of Gaoyou sag[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60(S1): 70-76.