直光纤及螺旋缠绕光纤三维地震响应机制

doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2024.01.009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (7289 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Distributed Acoustic Sensing （DAS） measures axial strain or strain rate， and straight optical fibers receive a single component signal and are insensitive to the response of waves incident perpendicularly to the fiber. Helically wound optical fibers can receive multi-component signals， which can solve the problem of insensitive response. Firstly， the theoretical axial strain rate responses of P-wave， SV， and SH waves of straight optical fibers and helically wound optical fibers with winding angles of 35.3° and 54.7° are analyzed. Secondly， the axial strain rate response is simulated using the three-dimensional elastic finite difference method. Finally， DAS is deployed on the surface， horizontal wells， and vertical wells， and the seismic responses of straight optical fibers and helically wound optical fibers with winding angles of 35.3° and 54.7° are simulated using uniform models， double-layer models， and southwest shale gas models. The axial strain rate response of DAS is compared with the velocity z component and pressure component of conventional detectors. The results show that： ① Straight optical fibers receive single component information， but the response of waves received in the direction perpendicular to the optical fiber is weak， while helically wound optical fibers receive multi-component information， so the response of waves received in the direction perpendicular to the optical fiber is strong； ②there is no S-wave response in the helically wound optical fiber seismic record with a winding angle of 35.3°， and its waveform is similar to the pressure component of a conventional detector. The acoustic equation can be used for imaging.

Key words： straight optical fiber helically wound optical fiber winding angle axial strain rate response finite difference modeling

Received: 31 March 2023

PACS:

P631

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHI Zhiwen
	YANG Jidong
	WANG Yangzhou
	HUANG Jianping
	QIN Shanyuan
	YANG Yonghong

Cite this article:

SHI Zhiwen,YANG Jidong,WANG Yangzhou等. Three-dimensional seismic response mechanism of straight and helically wound optical fibers[J]. OGP, 2024, 59(1): 80-88.

URL:

http://www.ogp-cn.com/EN/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2024.01.009 OR http://www.ogp-cn.com/EN/Y2024/V59/I1/80

[1]	MESTAYER J,COX B,WILLS P,et al.Field trials of distributed acoustic sensing for geophysical monitoring[C].SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2011,30:4253-4257.
[2]	PARKER T,SHATALIN S,FARHADIROUSHAN M. Distributed acoustic sensing-A new tool for seismic applications[J].First Break,2014,32(2):61-69.
[3]	DALEY T M,FREIFELD B M,AJO-FRANKLIN J,et al. Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring[J].The Leading Edge,2013,32(6):699-706.
[4]	李彦鹏,李飞,李建国,等.DAS技术在井中地震勘探的应用[J].石油物探,2020,59(2):242-249.LI Yanpeng,LI Fei,LI Jianguo,et al.Application of distributed acoustic sensing in borehole seismic exploration[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020,59(2):242-249.
[5]	BAKULIN A,GOLOKOV P,SMITH R,et al.Smart DAS upholes for simultaneous land near-surface characterization and subsurface imaging[J].The Leading Edge,2017,36(12):1001-1008.
[6]	MOLENAAR M M,HILL D J,WEBSTER P,et al.First downhole application of distributed acoustic sensing for hydraulic-fracturing monitoring and diagnostics[J].SPE Drilling & Completion,2012,27(1): 32-38.
[7]	HORNMAN K,Kuvshinov B N,Zwartjes P M, et al.Field trial of a broadside-sensitive distributed acoustic sensing cable for surface seismic[C].Extended Abstracts of 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition,2013,DOI:DOI.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20130383.
[8]	KUVSHINOV B. Interaction of helically wound fiber‐optic cables with plane seismic waves[J].Geophysical Prospecting,2016,64(3):671-688.
[9]	INNANEN K.Determination of seismic-tensor strain from Helical Wound Cable-Distributed Acoustic Sensing cable with arbitrary and nested-helix winds[C].SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2017,36:926-930.
[10]	EAID M V,LI J,INNANEN K A.Modeling the response of shaped DAS fibres to microseismic moment tensor sources[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2018,37:4698-4702
[11]	EAID M V,KEATING S D,INNANEN K A.Multi-parameter seismic elastic full waveform inversion with combined geophone and shaped fiberoptic cable data[J]. Geophysics,2020,85(6):R537-R552.
[12]	陈亮,黄建平,王自颖,等.应用自适应变网格紧致差分的地震波数值模拟及逆时偏移[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2023,58(3):641-650,712.CHEN Liang,HUANG Jianping,WANG Ziying,et al. Seismic numerical simulation and reverse time migration with adaptive variable-grid and compact difference method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2023,58(3):641-650,712.
[13]	徐世刚,包乾宗,任志明.简化的三维TTI介质黏滞纯声波方程及其数值模拟[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2022,57(2):331-341.XU Shigang,BAO Qianzong,REN Zhiming. A simplified pure visco acoustic wave equation for 3D TTI media and its numerical simulation[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2022,57(2):331-341.
[14]	贾宗锋,吴国忱,李青阳,等.标量波方程广义有限差分正演模拟[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2022,57(1):101-110.JIA Zongfeng,WU Guochen,LI Qingyang,et al. Forward modeling of scalar wave equation with generalized finite difference method[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022,57(1):101-110.
[15]	杨尚倍,白超英,ZHOUBing.时间域广义2.5D一阶波动方程曲网格有限差分法数值模拟[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2021,56(6):1262-1278.YANG Shangbei,BaI Chaoying,ZHOU B.Curvilinear-grid finite-difference numerical simulation method for generalized first-order 2.5D time-domain wave equation[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2021,56(6):1262-1278.
[16]	LELLOUCH A,LINDESEY N J,ELLSWORTH W L,et al. Comparison between distributed acoustic sensing and geophones:Downhole microseismic monitoring of the FORGE geothermal experiment[J].Seismological Research Letters,2020,91(6):3256-3268.
[17]	MA Y,LI W.Comparing DAS and geophone data and imaging for monitoring CO2 sequestration[C].Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, 2022,524-528.
[18]	梁兴,王松,刘成,等.光纤传感技术在昭通山地页岩气勘探开发实践中的应用进展[J].石油物探,2022,61(1):32-40.LIANG Xing,WANG Song,LIU Cheng,et al.Progress of the application of optical fiber sensing technology in shale gas exploration and development practice in the Zhaotong mountain area[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2022,61(1):32-40.
[19]	马国旗,曹丹平,尹教建,等.分布式声传感井中地震信号检测数值模拟方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,2020, 55(2):311-320.MA Guoqi,CAO Danping,YIN Jiaojian,et al.Numerical simulation of detecting seismic signals in DAS wells[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2020,55(2):311-320.
[20]	曹丹平,律军军,孙上饶,等.基于螺旋缠绕光纤的分布式声波传感三分量信号采集机理研究[J].石油物探,2022,61(1):60-69.CAO Danping,LYU Junjun,SUN Shangrao,et al.Three-component signal acquisition mechanism of distributed acoustic sensing based on helically winding fiber-optic[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2022,61(1):60-69.
[21]	郑伋.分布式光纤传感器(DAS)弹性波场响应特征研究[D].北京:北京中国地质大学(北京),2019.
[22]	姚艺,王一博,王伟君,等.分布式光纤声波传感微振动响应特征[J].地球物理学报,2023,66(2):713-730.YAO Yi, WANG Yibo,WANG Weijun,et al.Micro-vibration response characteristics of Distributed Acoustic Sensing[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2023,66(2):713-730.
[23]	WU C.3D finite-difference elastic modeling for DAS VSP and microseismic surveys[C].First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy Expanded Abstracts, 2021,DOI:10.1190/segam2021-3589262.1.