页岩各向异性对被动源微地震波场的影响

doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.06.015

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (11403 KB) HTML []
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要页岩储层具有较强的各向异性特征，忽略页岩各向异性对被动源微地震波（水力压裂产生）传播的影响，可能会降低储层表征结果的可信度。为此，提出一种定量评估地震波场旅行时和振幅偏差的方法，并基于理论数值算例，研究页岩各向异性对被动源微地震波场的影响。首先，利用矩张量模型描述爆炸型和剪切型微地震震源，并基于三维各向异性介质弹性波动方程和交错网格有限差分算法，正演模拟被动源的微地震波场；然后，对比不同震源、不同程度各向异性介质的理论波场，计算其P波和S波相对于各向同性介质波场的旅行时及振幅偏差，定性分析和定量评估不同震源机制下页岩各向异性对微地震波场特征的具体影响。数值算例的结果表明：对于所采用的地面微地震监测系统和平层VTI介质模型，页岩各向异性对微地震波场旅行时和振幅的影响均较为显著，旅行时偏差可达子波周期的30%，振幅相对偏差则高达60%，且旅行时偏差随炮检距增加而增大。此外，不同震源机制下，微地震波场特征受页岩各向异性影响的规律相似。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴如悦
	李晗
	常旭
	严红勇
	王一博

关键词 ：微地震, 页岩各向异性, 震源机制, 直达波, 振幅, 旅行时, 数值模拟

Abstract：Shale reservoir is featured by strong anisotropy. Ignoring the impact of shale anisotropy on the microseismic wavefield of passive sources (induced by fracturing stimulation) could affect the credibility of reservoir characterization. We proposes a method for quantitatively evaluating the deviation in travel time and amplitude of seismic wavefields,and study the influence of shale anisotropy on the microseismic wavefield of passive sources based on synthetic numerical test. Firstly,we use moment tensor to define explosive and shear microseismic sources,and caculate the microseismic wavefield of passive sources based on the elastic wave equation for three-dimensional anisotropic media and the staggered-grid finite-difference algorithm. Secondly,by comparing theoretical wavefields induced by different sources in different anisotropy media,we calculate the deviation in travel time and amplitude of P wave and S wave relative to isotropic models,and quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the impact of shale anisotropy on the microseismic wavefields under different source mechanisms. Numerical test show that for a surface microseismic monitoring system and a horizontally layered VTI medium model,shale anisotropy has significant influence on the travel time and amplitude. The travel time can deviate by 30%,and the deviation of amplitude can be up to 60%. The deviation of the travel time increases with increasing offset. In addition,under different source mechanisms,the impact of shale anisotropy on the microseismic wavefield are similar to each other.

Key words： microseismic shale anisotropy source mechanism direct wave amplitude travel time numerical test

收稿日期: 2020-01-22

PACS:

P631

基金资助:本项研究受国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“微地震震源机制与页岩储层衰减系数（Q值）联合反演）”（41804050）和国家科技重大专项课题“陆相页岩油甜点地球物理识别与预测方法”（2017ZX05049-002）联合资助。

通讯作者: 常旭,北京市朝阳区北土城西路19号中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,100029。Email:changxu@mail.iggcas.ac.cn E-mail: changxu@mail.iggcas.ac.cn

作者简介: 吴如悦,硕士研究生,1996年生;2018年毕业于吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院,获地球物理学专业学士学位;现于中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所攻读硕士学位。主要从事被动源微地震各向异性数值模拟方面的学习和研究。

引用本文:

吴如悦, 李晗, 常旭, 严红勇, 王一博. 页岩各向异性对被动源微地震波场的影响[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(6): 1292-1304. WU Ruyue, LI Han, CHANG Xu, YAN Hongyong, WANG Yibo. Impact of shale anisotropy on the microseismic wavefield of passive sources. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(6): 1292-1304.

链接本文:

http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.06.015 或 http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/Y2020/V55/I6/1292

[1]	张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等.中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-141.ZHANG Jinchuan,XU Bo,NIE Haikuan,et al.Exploration potential of shale gas resources in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(6):136-140.
[2]	徐刚,李德旗,王适择,等.微地震监测在地震地质工程一体化中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(增刊2):115-123.XU Gang,LI Deqi,WANG Shize,et al.Microseismic monitoring in seismic and geology integration[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(S2):115-123.
[3]	Vernik L,Nur A.Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks[J].Geophysics,1992,57(5):727-735.
[4]	Johnston J E,Christensen N I.Seismic anisotropy of shales[J].Journal Geophysical Research,1995,100(B4):5991-6003.
[5]	刘财,邓馨卉,郭智奇,等.基于岩石物理的页岩储层各向异性表征[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(2):339-346.LIU Cai,DENG Xinhui,GUO Zhiqi,et al.Shale reservoir anisotropic characterization based on rock physics[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(2):339-346.
[6]	Virieux J.SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media:Velocity-stress finite-difference method[J].Geophysics,1984,49(11):1933-1942.
[7]	陈颙,黄庭芳,刘恩儒.岩石物理学[M].安徽合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2009.CHEN Yong,HUANG Tingfang,LIU Enru.Rock Physics[M].Press of University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei,Anhui,2009.
[8]	常旭,王一博.微地震反演研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2019.CHANG Xu,WANG Yibo.Microseismic Inversion[M].Science Press,Beijing,2019.
[9]	Carcione,José M,Helle H B,et al.Effects of attenuation and anisotropy on reflection amplitude versus offset[J].Geophysics,1998,63(5):1652-1658.
[10]	Tsvankin I,Gaiser J,Grechka V,et al.Seismic aniso-tropy in exploration and reservoir characterization:An overview[J].Geophysics,2010,75:A15-A29.
[11]	孙伟家,符力耘,管西竹,等.页岩气地震勘探中页岩各向异性的地震模拟研究[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(3):961-970.SUN Weijia,FU Liyun,GUAN Xizhu,et al.A study on anisotropy of shale using seismic forward modeling in shale gas exploration[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(3):961-970.
[12]	Li H,Liu X,Chang X,et al.Impact of shale anisotropy on seismic wavefield[J].Energies,2019,12(23):4412.
[13]	Thomsen L.Weak elastic anisotropy[J].Geophysics,1986,51(10):1954-1966.
[14]	Levander A R.Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms[J].Geophysics,1988,53(11):1425-1436.
[15]	Saenger E H,Gold N,Shapiro S A.Modeling the pro-pagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid[J].Wave Motion,2000,31(1):77-92.
[16]	Saenger E H,Bohlen T.Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid[J].Geophysics,2004,69(2):583-591.
[17]	吴国忱,梁锴,印兴耀.TTI介质弹性波相速度与偏振特征分析[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(8):1914-1923.WU Guochen,LIANG Kai,YIN Xingyao.The analysis of phase velocity and polarization feature for elastic wave in TTI media[J].Chinese Journal of Geophy-sics,2010,53(8):1914-1923.
[18]	王璐琛,常旭,王一博.TTI介质的交错网格伪P波正演方法[J].地球物理学报,2016,59(3):1046-1058.WANG Luchen,CHANG Xu,WANG Yibo.Forward modeling of pseudo P waves in TTI medium using staggered grid[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2016,59(3):1046-1058.
[19]	姚振岸,孙成禹,唐杰,等.基于不同震源机制的黏弹各向异性微地震波场模拟[J].石油地球物理勘探,2017,52(1):63-70.YAO Zhen'an,SUN Chengyu,TANG Jie,et al.Micro-seismic forward modeling in viscoelastic anisotropic media based on different focal mechanisms[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2017,52(1):63-70.
[20]	唐杰,温雷,王浩,等.正交各向异性介质中的剪张源震源机制与矩张量特征[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(6):1247-1255.TANG Jie,WEN Lei,WANG Hao,et al.Focal mechanisms and moment tensor in orthorhombic anisotropic media[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(6):1247-1255.
[21]	Danggo M Y,Mungkasi S.A staggered grid finitedifference method for solving the elastic wave equations[J].Journal of Physics:Conference Series,2017,909:012047.
[22]	Graves R W.Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite diffe-rences[J].Bulletin Seismological Socitey of America,1996,86(4):1091-1106.
[23]	Liu Y,Sen M K.An implicit staggered-grid finite-difference method for seismic modelling[J].Geophy-sical Journal International,2009,179(1):459-474.
[24]	Bossy E,Talmant M,Laugier P.Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models[J].J Acoust Soc Am, 2004,115(5):2314-2324.
[25]	Liu X,Guo Z,Liu C,et al.Anisotropy rock physics model for the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Applied Geophysics,2017,14(1):21-30.
[26]	Qin Y,Zhang Z,Xu S.CDP mapping in tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media.Part Ⅱ:Velocity analysis by combining CDP mapping with a genetic algorithm[J].Geophysical Prospecting,2003,51(4):325-332.