相位域储层预测技术——以胜利油田埕岛地区河道砂为例

doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2022.05.014

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3318 KB) HTML []
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要不同岩性、物性变化会引起地震信号相位变化，因此从地震数据中有效地提取相位信息并进行分析，可识别特殊地质体以及目标储层。为此，提出并实现了相位域储层预测技术，其核心是相位分解与重构，分析和确定敏感相位是相位域储层预测成败的关键。包括三个步骤：一是地震道的相位分解与重构，可得到相位重构后的分相位地震数据以及相位道集；二是敏感相位分析，根据研究区的地震、地质特征得到对储层变化最敏感的相位；三是应用地震属性分析技术分析分相位数据体，主要包括剖面分析以及切片分析等，最终实现储层预测。模型分析表明，在合成地震记录上不能体现薄层波阻抗的横向差异，而合成地震记录分相位数据放大了薄层内细微的横向阻抗差异，易于识别。实际应用表明，敏感相位数据体的地震属性更清楚地刻画了河道，分辨率更高。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	罗红梅
	杨培杰
	王延光
	穆星
	王长江

关键词 ：相位域, 相位分解, 相位重构, 分相位数据, 相位道集, 储层预测

Abstract：Changes in lithology and physical properties alter the phase of the seismic signal. Therefore, effectively extracting and then analyzing phase information from seismic data are conducive to identifying special geological bodies and target reservoirs. For this reason, this paper proposes and implements a phase-domain reservoir prediction technology, the core of which is phase decomposition and reconstruction. Analyzing and determining the sensitive phase is the key to the success of phase-domain reservoir prediction, and it involves three steps. Step 1 is the phase decomposition and reconstruction of seismic traces, which produce phase-decomposed seismic data and phase gathers after phase reconstruction. Step 2 is sensitive phase analysis, whereby the phase most sensitive to reservoir changes can be obtained according to the seismic-geological characteristics of the study area. Step 3 is the analysis of phase-decomposed data bodies with the seismic attribute analysis technology, mainly involving profile analysis and slice analysis, to ultimately achieve reservoir prediction. The model analysis shows that synthetic seismic records fail to reflect the lateral differences in wave impedance in thin layers, whereas phase-decomposed data of synthetic seismic records amplify the subtle lateral impedance differences in thin layers so that they are easy to identify. The practical application reveals that the seismic attribu-tes of the data body in the sensitive phase depict the channel more clearly and offer higher resolution.

Key words： phase domain phase decomposition phase reconstruction phase-decomposed data phase gather reservoir prediction

收稿日期: 2021-08-20

PACS:

P631

基金资助:本项研究受中国石化股份有限公司科技项目“复杂地质体多学科协同建模与有效储层预测技术”(P20055-8)资助

通讯作者: 杨培杰,山东省东营市聊城路2号中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院，257015。Email：yangpeijie.slyt@sinopec.com E-mail: yangpeijie.slyt@sinopec.com

作者简介: 罗红梅,研究员，1973年生；1995年获中国石油大学(华东)计算机及应用专业学士学位；2008年获中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业硕士学位；2014年获中国科学院地质与地球物理所矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业博士学位。现为中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院首席专家，主要从事储层预测新技术开发与地震地质综合研究

引用本文:

罗红梅, 杨培杰, 王延光, 穆星, 王长江. 相位域储层预测技术——以胜利油田埕岛地区河道砂为例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2022, 57(5): 1129-1137. LUO Hongmei, YANG Peijie, WANG Yanguang, MU Xing, WANG Changjiang. Phase-domain reservoir prediction technology: a case study of channel sand in Chengdao area, Shengli Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022, 57(5): 1129-1137.

链接本文:

http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2022.05.014 或 http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/Y2022/V57/I5/1129

[1]	PARTYKA G, GRIDLEY J, LOPEZ J. Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization[J]. The Leading Edge,1999,18(3):353-360.
[2]	CASTAGNA J P,SUN S,SIEGFRIED R,et al. Instantaneous spectral analysis: detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbon[J]. The Leading Edge,2003,22(2):120-127.
[3]	刘力辉,李建海,孙莹频,等.时频属性法薄互层预测[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2017,52(6):1261-1268.LIU Lihui,LI Jianhai,SUN Yingpin,et al.Thin inter-bed prediction with time and frequency attributes[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2017,52(6):1261-1268.
[4]	穆星,卢新甫,杨培杰.基于高阶统计量的高分辨率时频分析方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(6):56-59.MU Xing,LU Xinfu,YANG Peijie.High resolution time-frequency analysis method based on high-order statistics[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(6):56-59.
[5]	杨培杰. 复数域约束最小二乘拓频[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2021,56(6):1244-1253.YANG Peijie.Constrained complex-domain least-squares spectrum blueing[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2021,56(6):1244-1253.
[6]	PORSANI M J,URSIN B. Mixed-phase deconvolution and wavelet estimation[J]. The Leading Edge,2000,19(1):76-79.
[7]	蔺玉曌,李振春,张凯,等.相位空间内的解缠绕相位反演[J].地球物理学报,2020,63(7):2710-2721.LIN Yuzhao,LI Zhenchun,ZHANG Kai,et al.Full unwrapped phase inversion in the phase space[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2020,63(7):2710-2721.
[8]	PEI S,YIN X Y,LI K. Seismic inversion method based on constraint of instantaneous phase[C].SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2019,38:3205-3209.
[9]	CAO D P,LI Y,SUN W G. Joint Q inversion based on amplitude and phase information[C].SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2019,38:789-793.
[10]	乐友喜,江凡,问雪,等.用于地震反射界面识别的瞬时相位复合属性[J].物探化探计算技术,2012,34(5):505-509.YUE Youxi,JIANG Fan,WEN Xue,et al. Composite attribute drived from instantaneous phase for the re-cognition of reflecting interface[J].Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2012,34(5):505-509.
[11]	蔡涵鹏,龙浩,贺振华,等.基于地震数据瞬时相位谱的地层厚度估算[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(4):575-581.CAI Hanpeng,LONG Hao,HE Zhenhua,et al. Thickness estimation from instantaneous phase spectrum of post stack seismic data[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(4):575-581.
[12]	王鹏,胡向阳,魏水建.基于改进的相位目标函数估算薄层厚度[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(1):178-185.WANG Peng,HU Xiangyang,WEI Shuijian.Thin bed thickness estimation based on an improved phase objective function[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(1):178-185.
[13]	杨培杰,罗红梅,王金铎. 地震数据分相位重构方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2019,54(3):594-599.YANG Peijie,LUO Hongmei,WANG Jinduo. Seismic data phase reconstruction[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2019,54(3):594-599.
[14]	CASTAGNA J,OYEM A,PORTNIAGUINE O,et al. Phase decomposition[J]. Interpretation,2016,4(3):SN1-SN10.
[15]	张生强,张志军,李尧,等.基于地震相位分解的自适应强反射分离方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,2021,56(6):1236-1243.ZHANG Shengqiang,ZHANG Zhijun,LI Yao,et al. Adaptive strong reflection separation method based on seismic phase decomposition[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2021,56(6):1236-1243.
[16]	杨培杰. 地震子波盲提取与非线性反演[D]. 山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.
[17]	王长江,杨培杰,罗红梅,等.基于广义S变换的时变分频技术[J].石油物探,2013,52(5):489-494.WANG Changjiang,YANG Peijie,LUO Hongmei,et al.Time-varable frequency division based on generali-zed S transform[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2013,52(5):489-494.
[18]	王祝文,向旻,刘菁华,等.基于分数阶Fourier变换的声波测井全波列特征时频分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(5):1553-1570.WANG Zhuwen,XIANG Min,LIU Jinghua,et al. Time-frequency analysis for full waveform characteri-stics of acoustic logging based on fractal Fourier transform[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Sci-ence Edition),2012,42(5):1553-1570.
[19]	武国宁,于萌萌,王君仙,等.应用平稳小波变换与深度残差网络压制地震随机噪声[J].石油地球物理勘探,2022,57(1):43-51.WU Guoning,YU Mengmeng,WANG Junxian,et al. Seismic random noise attenuation based on stationary wavelet transform and deep residual neural network[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2022,57(1):43-51.
[20]	HAMPSON D P. AVO inversion,theory and practice[J]. The Leading Edge,1991,10(6):39-42.
[21]	PURYEAR C I,PORTNIAGUINE O N,COBOS C M,et al.Constrained least-squares spectral analysis:Application to seismic data[J]. Geophysics,2012,77(5):V143-V167.
[22]	PORTNIAGUINE O,CASTAGNA J P. Inverse spectral decomposition[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2004,23:1786-1789.
[23]	杨培杰,隋风贵.一种改进的最小二乘时频分析方法[J].石油物探,2020,59(5):815-822.YANG Peijie,SUI Fenggui. An improved least squares time-frequency analysis[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2020,59(5):815-822.
[24]	刘丽. 埕岛油田馆陶组曲流河砂体叠置模式[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(1):40-48.LIU Li. Sandbody superimposed pattern of meande-ring river facies of Guantao Formation in Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(1):40-48.